More Talk on Security Convergence
Forrester issued a report earlier this year on the convergence of Physical and Logical Security. The author, Steve Hunt, felt strongly enough about the subject to leave and form 4AInternational, a consulting firm focused on securty convergence.
Security Focus, published a nice summary
of the report which I’ve been meaning to discuss for some time. Anyone following the security convergence discussions would not be surprised by Forrester’s conclusions. However, it puts numbers on the size of the security convergence market and adds the weight of third party validation to media and conference discussions about security convergence.
What does this mean for convergence? There are a few key areas that offer immediate opportunities for convergence with a moderate effort. First and foremost, card integration. Other areas are policy development, reporting structrues, monitoring software, combined incident response, and regulatory compliance. This is where we should see growth over the next 12 months. Now is the time to lay the groundwork for larger efforts in 2006.
Now, to 4AInternational. During engagements with my clients “security convergence” has a achieved buzzword penetration. Convergence issues are being taken seriously in the context of other efforts. What we are not seeing is security convergence as a stand alone project. Major vendors offer lip service but few effectively offer products and solutions.
Talking about the benefits of security convergence at the C-level is fairly easy. Getting to those benefits is a little more difficult. Traditionally the physical and logical security efforts in an enterprise have different organizational structures and career paths. Both can have great systems, but there are very few individuals with the experience to talk to both groups. What most people do not realize is that physical and logical security systems integration can start small and may not be as far off as they think. If 4AInternational can put together a team that outlines the convergence business case for both sides of security and shows the client the low hanging fruit, they could find themselves with a nice slice of that security convergence growth.
Security-Flaws » Blog Archive » Wedded to physical and IT security?
Comments
RSS feed for comments on this post.
The URI to TrackBack this entry is: http://www.identityinitiative.com/modules/wordpress/wp-trackback.php/27
No comments yet.
Leave a Comment
Line and paragraph breaks automatic, website trumps email, HTML allowed: <a href="" title="" rel=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>

